Prosecutors In Levy Case Overcame Long Odds
Don't Miss This
- Logic Behind Ferguson Grand Jury’s Decision Not To Indict Police Officer May Remain Mystery
- Man Behind Hidden Cash Craze Announces New Charity Effort Aimed At Fighting Hunger
- Brutal Beating Of Disabled Yuba City Man Likely Was Gang Violence
- Sacramento Police Ready For Protests, But Say Outreach Is Key To Avoid Violence
- Reaction To Ferguson Grand Jury Decision Fanned By Social Media
WASHINGTON (AP) — The prosecutors who obtained a first-degree murder conviction this week in the Chandra Levy murder trial readily acknowledged the holes in their case.
No DNA evidence. No eyewitnesses. And a police investigation that initially focused relentlessly not on defendant Ingmar Guandique but on former Congressman Gary Condit.
But legal observers say the prosecution overcame those flaws with emotionally gripping testimony from two women who survived assaults against them by Guandique.
Analysts say the testimony from the two women in the trial’s opening days set a tone that defense attorneys ultimately could not overcome.
Guandique was convicted Monday in Levy’s 2001 disappearance and death, bringing resolution to one of the nation’s most sensational murder mysteries.
(Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)