Poll: Near-Split In US Over Legal Gay Marriage

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barbara Von Aspern loves her daughter, “thinks the world” of the person her daughter intends to marry and believes the pair should have the same legal rights as anyone else. It pains her, but Von Aspern is going to skip their wedding. Her daughter, Von Aspern explains, is marrying another woman.

“We love them to death, and we love them without being judgmental,” the 62-year-old Chandler, Ariz., retiree said. “But the actual marriage I cannot agree with.”

It’s complicated, this question of legitimizing gay marriage. Americans are grappling with it from their homes to the halls of government in the shadow of a presidential election next year. The ambivalence is reflected in a new poll that shows the nation is passionate, conflicted and narrowly split on same-sex marriage.

Fifty-three percent of the 1,000 adults surveyed believe the government should give legal recognition to marriages between couples of the same sex, about the same as last year, according to the nationwide telephone poll by The Associated Press and the National Constitution Center. Forty-four percent were opposed.

People are similarly conflicted over what, if anything, the government should do about the issue.

Support for legal recognition of same-sex marriage has shifted in recent years, from a narrow majority opposed in 2009 to narrow majority support now. Some of the shift stems from a generational divide, with the new poll showing a majority of Americans under age 65 in favor of legal recognition for same-sex marriages, and a majority of seniors opposed.

In some places, government has moved ahead while the nation debates. New York in July became the sixth state, along with the District of Columbia, to legalize same-sex marriage. Still, the issue played a part in the special election Tuesday to replace disgraced former Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y. Democrat David Weprin’s support for gay marriage cost him support among the district’s Orthodox Jews, and he lost to Republican Bob Turner.

Also Tuesday, lawmakers in North Carolina, the only state in the Southeast that does not have language in its constitution banning gay marriage, voted to put the question on the 2012 ballot. Most Americans who live in states where gay marriage is not already legal say it is unlikely their state will pass such a law; just 20 percent think it is likely to become law in their state.

Americans also are conflicted on how to go about legalizing or outlawing gay marriage.

One option is banning gay marriage by constitutional amendment. About half of the poll’s respondents, 48 percent, said they would favor such an amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. Most who feel this way do so intensely. About 40 percent would strongly favor such a change. Forty-three percent said they would oppose such an amendment, and 8 percent were neutral, according to the poll.

Most — 55 percent — believe the issue should be handled at the state level, however, and opinions on how states should act are split. People are about evenly divided on whether their states should allow same-sex marriages — 42 percent favor that and 45 percent are opposed — and tilt in favor of state laws that allow gay couples to form civil unions — 47 percent in favor, 38 percent opposed and 13 percent neutral, according to the poll.

“The different moral standards in different areas, probably, are the biggest reason that same-sex marriages are an issue,” said Dale Shoemaker, 54, a military retiree from Boise, Idaho. If gay couples who want to get married live in a state that doesn’t allow it, they can move to one that does, he said.

Either way, gay couples “should have benefits,” Shoemaker said. “If they’re living together and cohabitating and are a couple, (they should have) the insurance and retirement and that type of thing, the monetary benefits.”

Nearly 6 in 10 (57 percent) in the poll shared Shoemaker’s take when it comes to government benefits. They said same-sex couples should be entitled to the same legal benefits as married couples of the opposite sex. Forty percent felt the government should distinguish between them.

The poll did uncover some inequities. It suggests, for example, that opponents of same-sex marriage were far more apt to say that the issue is one of deep importance to them. Forty-four percent of those polled called it extremely or very important for them personally. Among those who favor legal marriage for gay couples, 32 percent viewed the issue as that important.

Von Aspern is an example of an American whose opposition to gay marriage is deep and abiding. It’s based on her religion — she is Mormon — and as such it overrode other considerations when it came to her daughter’s wedding.

“It was very difficult,” Von Aspern says. “We had to bring them to the house and hug them and love them and tell them these things and not let that keep us apart.”

(Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

  • Michelle

    So if your belief is based on your religion and if you have ever had unprotected sex, anal sex or sex for pleasure and not procreation – your vote against same sex marriage should not count. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.

    Shame on the mother for not attending her daughter’s wedding.. You don’t have to agree to call it a marriage. But you should go in support of your daughter. She knows your views on that aspect of it. But that is not the whole of it. She is your daughter and you lover her. Go to the wedding.

  • STand up for true Christianity!

    This should have never been a legal issue because it is not criminal behavior. It is a very personal spiritual issue. I am a full fledged Catholic and will not vote to have gay marriage banned!

    We all have to answer to God for something. We are human and this means we are not perfect. But to put limits on one’s personal free will is ludicrous, [except of course for criminal behavior!]. This belongs to God alone. Or if you don’t believe in God, it belongs to whomever you do believe in! Even if it is yourself! And if someone steps out of HIS realm, it is their free will that HE provided and they must answer to HIM, not us…

    No one has any right to make laws on personal spiritual choices.,

    I will make a wager that most of you for making this illegal are against abortion [ as I am!!!]. However, I am against it because someone else [the mother] is making the choice FOR another human being [the baby] .
    Isn’t this what we are doing when we make the choice FOR gays to purchase a piece of paper and live as they choose or not? Think about that.

    Free will.

    It is a God-given right as well as an American one.

    • michelle

      IF this was Facebook I’d give you a “like”

      • STand up for true Christianity!

        ahhh thanks…. haha
        I just think these people who claim they are Christian should start looking at themselves, not others. If we all take care of ourselves, the world would better.

blog comments powered by Disqus
The Taz Show
LIVE: Monday through Friday from 6am – 6pm ET

Listen Live