Truly Driverless Cars Could Be On California Roads By End Of 2017

LOS ANGELES (AP) – Cars with no steering wheel, no pedals and nobody at all inside could be driving themselves on California roads by the end of the year, under proposed state rules that would give a powerful boost to the fast-developing technology.

For the past several years, tech companies and automakers have been testing self-driving cars on the open road in California. But regulators insisted those vehicles have steering wheels, foot controls and human backup drivers who could take over in an emergency.

On Friday, the state Department of Motor Vehicles proposed regulations that would open the way for truly driverless cars.

[graphiq id=”5hUMwYliij3″ title=”Americans Not Convinced of Driverless Car Safety” width=”600″ height=”558″ url=”https://w.graphiq.com/w/5hUMwYliij3″ link=”https://www.graphiq.com/vlp/5hUMwYliij3″ link_text=”Graphiq” ]

Under the rules, road-testing of such vehicles could begin by the end of 2017, and a limited number could become available to customers as early as 2018 – provided the federal government gives the necessary permission.

Current federal automobile standards require steering wheels, though the U.S. Transportation Department has encouraged self-driving technology and could look favorably on such projects.

While a few other states have welcomed such testing, this is a major step forward for the industry, given California’s size as the most populous state, its clout as the nation’s biggest car market and its longtime role as a cultural trendsetter.

The proposed regulations also amount to the most detailed regulatory framework of any state.

“California has taken a big step. This is exciting,” said Bryant Walker Smith, a law professor at the University of South Carolina who tracks government policy on self-driving cars.

The rules are subject to a comment period and a public hearing and could change. Regulators hope to put them in effect by December.

The proposal is more than two years overdue, reflecting complex questions of safety and technology. Self-driving systems rely on highly advanced sensors and software.

“We don’t want to race to meet a deadline,” said Bernard Soriano, a leader of the motor vehicle agency’s self-driving program. “We want to get this right.”

In one important change from prior drafts, once a manufacturer declares its technology is road-ready, it can put its cars on the market. That self-certification approach mirrors how federal officials regulate standard cars, and represents a big victory for such major players as Waymo, Google’s self-driving car project.

A Waymo spokesman had no immediate comment.

Also under the proposed regulations, any driverless car still must be remotely monitored and able to pull itself over safely in an emergency.

The chief skeptic of the technology, California-based Consumer Watchdog, said the proposal does not protect the public.

The DMV “is being seduced by the hype from the self-driving car developers,” Consumer Watchdog’s John Simpson said. “There’s been a rolling back of sensible safety provisions.”

Meanwhile, some of those companies want more.

The Association of Global Automakers, which represents a dozen manufacturers, said the proposal would establish “significant barriers that do not exist in other states and are inconsistent with federal guidance.”

The technology is developing quickly. More than a year ago, a Waymo prototype with no steering wheel or pedals drove a blind man on city streets in Texas.

Supporters say the cars may one day be far safer than those with humans at the wheel, since the machinery won’t drive distracted, drunk or drowsy.

During road-testing in California, self-driving cars with human backup drivers are believed to have caused just a few collisions.

A year ago, Waymo reported that during the 424,331 miles its cars had driven themselves, a human driver intervened 11 times to avoid a collision. In an update earlier this year, Waymo said its fleet had driven 636,868 miles in autonomous mode; it did not say how many crashes were avoided.

In all, 27 companies have Department of Motor Vehicles permits to test on California roads.

Waymo was able to legally put its prototype on the road in Texas because state law there does not prohibit a fully driverless car. Other states have explicitly invited the technology onto its roads, including Michigan, whose governor signed a bill in December that allows the public testing of cars with no driver.

In the meantime, the industry has been lobbying the U.S. Transportation Department and Congress for rule changes that could speed the introduction of truly driverless cars.

___

Contact Justin Pritchard at https://twitter.com/lalanewsman .

 

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press.

Comments

One Comment

  1. But who is liable if the robot crashes into another car, pedestrian, or house?
    So far the answer is: YOU ARE.
    Google, GM, Tesla, none of those automated car companies are taking the fall for you.
    They say never buy a brand new car model in its first year, or buy version 1.0 of software.
    That good advice applies to robot cars, too.
    They’re not driverless…the robot is driving, but you are liable for the robot’s actions.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Sacramento

Get Our App
Get The CBS Sacramento Weather AppGet the latest radar, CBS13 AppCasts and hour-by-hour forecasts. You can also send your weather pics.

Watch & Listen LIVE