SACRAMENTO (AP) — The California Supreme Court has ruled that judges have broad authority in refusing to lighten the sentences of “three-strike” inmates, despite recent ballot measures aimed at reducing the state’s prison population.

In a 4-3 decision on Monday, the high court said judges may freely decline to trim sentences for inmates who qualify for reductions under a 2012 ballot measure intended to reform the three-strikes sentencing law.

Proposition 36 allowed inmates to obtain reductions if their third strike was not serious or violent.

The Los Angeles Times says the ruling came in appeals filed by David Valencia and Clifford Chaney, who were both eligible for reduced terms under Prop. 36.

A county judge refused to reduce Valencia’s sentence, calling him a risk to public safety.

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press.

  1. Rob Kwaitk says:

    Let’s keep base ball out of the law. Every & each case must be always considered as a first. There are serious dangers & issues with the 3 strike law; perhaps we should also include 4 balls to this game for fair play.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s