SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP/CBS13) — California’s process for imposing the death penalty “is now, and always has been, infected by racism,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday in a brief filed with the state Supreme Court.

Newsom filed the brief in the case of Donte Lamont McDaniel, who was sentenced to death in 2009 for the murder of 33-year-old George Brooks and 52-year-old Annette Anderson.

California juries can impose the death penalty if they find that “aggravating factors” outweigh “mitigating factors.” Additionally, the decision to sentence someone to death must be unanimous, but juries don’t have to unanimously agree on each aggravating factor.

McDaniel’s case is challenging that interpretation of the state Constitution. In his brief, lawyers on behalf of Newsom argue not requiring juries to agree on those factors increases racial discrimination in death penalty cases. They argue that “decades of study” show the percentage of Black people excluded from juries in death penalty cases was “double to triple” that of whites, mostly because as a group Black people are more likely to oppose the death penalty than white people.

They argue that’s a problem when it is time to sentence someone to death because “overall, White jurors ‘are much less receptive to mitigation’ than Black jurors” in cases where the defendant is Black and the victim is white. Meanwhile, Black jurors “are more likely than white jurors to ‘keep the sin separate from the sinner’ no matter what the race.”

But beyond that, Newsom’s brief argues that the death penalty in the United States is “rooted in the legacy of slavery, racial terror and subjugation,” saying it has been “disproportionately applied, first, to enslaved Africans and African Americans, and, later, to free Black people.”

READ: DA To Retry Convicted Murderer Scott Peterson For Death Penalty

The brief was written on behalf of Newsom by two professors at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law: Elizabeth Semel, director of the school’s Death Penalty Clinic, and Erwin Chemerinsky, the school’s dean. Newsom’s office said it was the first time a sitting California governor has filed a brief with the state Supreme Court “calling attention to the unfair and uneven application of the death penalty.”

“With this filing, we make clear that all Californians deserve the same right to a jury trial that is fair, and that is a matter of life and death,” Newsom said in a news release.

California has not executed anyone since 2006. In 2016, voters narrowly approved a ballot proposition designed to speed up the death penalty. But Newsom halted all executions in California last year, declaring he “will not oversee the execution of any individual.”

Nancy Haydt, executive director of anti-capital punishment advocacy group Death Penalty Focus, praised Newsom for saying the death penalty is racially biased. She pointed to cases in Los Angeles County, where 305 people have been sentenced to death since 1977. Of those, 44% are Black and 17% are white, according to the Habeas Corpus Resource Center. About 9% of Los Angeles County’s population is Black.

“It’s undeniable,” Haydt said.

Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the California Justice Legal Foundation, said it was “baloney” to say racism has infected the state’s death penalty process.

“The relevant comparison is death row versus the population of murderers, not death row versus the general population,” he said.

Comments (2)
  1. LegalEagle says:

    “Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the California Justice Legal Foundation, said it was “baloney” to say racism has infected the state’s death penalty process.”…..He’s full of baloney and poo because the California penal system, including police and courts, derives its authority from the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act, which has never been repealed by the way. Most people arrested are not either fugitives or slaves yet they are subjected to “corporation courts” none the less. Its all racist Kent, and your ignorance of the true nature of the “system” is part of the problem. People like Kent have made a living off of hiding the truth of the matter and I’d bet he never, in his career, filed a Motion challenging subject matter jurisdiction or jurisdiction in general challenging any courts power to detail, arrest or imprison free people….#He’sPartOfIt.

    1. Self Righteous says:

      So what. I sleep better at night knowing that blacks, whites and browns are locked up regardless if its legal, constitutional or moral. That’s just me, Kent is my hero, irrespective of whether or not he is part of it. Someone has to sell those people out, at least Kent can make a few dollars doing it. Besides warehousing people is a lucrative state business and we have thousands of correctional officers, police, lawyers and their families to feed. So what if its not constitutional, lawful or moral, at least they get a warm bed and some grub. Their families and children will get over it and I can sleep good at night and watch CNN in peace.

Leave a Reply