Reporting Kurtis Ming
Halloween decorations are supposed to be scary, but a small, 6-inch tall witch figurine gave a grandmother a real fright. Carol Piorek bought the item from a Burlington Coat Factory for her granddaughter.
But after she got the witch home, she noticed a warning label on the back that reads: “Prop. 65 warning: This product contains chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. Wash hands after handling.”
The label is part of the California Proposition 65 product warning initiative.
Piorek says she immediately became concerned because she thought, “… that they’re dangerous, they’re toxic, that they should not be for sale.”
Piorek complained to the manager of the Burlington Coat Factory store where she purchased the witch.
“He called me back and said they were pulling everything off the shelves,” said Piorek.
But when she returned to the same store a couple of days later, Piorek says she discovered that nothing had been done and the items with the warning labels were still for sale.
Now Piorek and her daughter-in-law Jenny Piorek are concerned for other families who may buy them.
“If they put that in their mouth,” said Jenny Piorek with her twin boys sitting in her lap, “and they put their fingers in their mouth afterwards, it’s just a scary thought.”
Our sister station in Chicago showed the decorative figures to a child safety expert familiar with California’s Proposition 65.
“It says you cannot subject children or others to dangerous chemicals or heavy metals and if you do, you need to have these kinds of labels,” said Nancy Cowles of the Kids In Danger advocacy group.
A spokeswoman for Burlington Coat factory refused to tell CBS who made or distributed the decorations, what chemicals are used to make them or how much of certain chemicals are contained in the products.
Knowing the manufacturer or distributor of the decorations could help determine if the supplier of those decorative items found at the Burlington Coast Factory stores were among more than a dozen that settled a lawsuit charging them with violating California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, known as Proposition 65, by not providing warnings about the risks from certain chemicals including lead, cadmium, arsenic, and formaldehyde.
The case filed by the Chanler Group was settled last October with the manufacturers and distributors agreeing to reformulate the products to ensure they contain less than specified levels of the chemicals.
Burlington Coat Factory says it was not a defendant in the case but as a result of the consent judgment the company asked its vendors to comply with the settlement agreement or provide the warning labels.
Kids in Danger does not think those labels give enough information.
“I think that is a problem for consumers because it leaves us without knowing what the hazard is we may be exposed to,” Cowles said.
That’s a criticism the Governor of California is hoping to correct with new legislation.
Burlington Coat Factory declined to be interviewed on camera for this report. But In a written statement said it is, “committed to ensuring products it sells are safe and comply with all applicable laws and regulations.”
The company also said, “it’s not aware of any risk or reported injury from these products and “has no reason to believe that they are not safe.”
- Call Kurtis: La-Z-Boy Won’t Fix My Saggy Chair Because of Stuffing Shortage
- Call Kurtis: The Redbox Kiosk Security Flaw
- Call Kurtis: How Long Can Stores Keep My Product For Repair Under Warranty?
- Call Kurtis: How You Can Take Back A Used Car
- Call Kurtis: I Turned In My Old License Plates, Why Did The DMV Suspend My License?
- Call Kurtis: Thousands of Soldiers Told They May Have To Pay Bonus Money Back
- Call Kurtis Investigates: 16-Year-Old Viewer Helps Change Unclaimed Property Law
- Call Kurtis: Homeowners Shocked by Years of Back Taxes
- Call Kurtis: The IRS Keeps Asking For My 2010 Tax Return!
- Call Kurtis Investigates: Companies That Pay Your Traffic Tickets